The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has announced it is going to change the way Americans can purchase plate covers, a product that is currently in the hands of thousands of businesses and consumers across the country.
The FDA has issued a new rule requiring companies that want to license plate covers to first make sure they are compliant with a set of requirements set by the FDA.
The new rule requires companies to submit an annual report to the FDA detailing how they comply with the requirements and provide evidence to support those compliance.
In the new rule, the FDA is making it more difficult for companies to skirt the requirements by requiring companies to provide evidence of compliance and to include a statement that a plate cover has not been used in the commission of a criminal offense.
The new rule also makes it more challenging for companies that do not meet the requirements to license plates to continue to sell plates.
The FDA has already made it more costly for companies who fail to meet the new requirements.
The industry has long fought the requirement to list the number of plates a company sells.
The rules mandate a statement to consumers saying “the plates you receive are for a licensed entity and are intended for use by that licensed entity only.”
While it is still unclear how many companies have failed to comply with this rule, a survey of 600 businesses conducted by the Institute for Justice found that in the past five years, over 30 percent have been able to circumvent the rule.
“The rule does not require that every business that wants to license an animal plate must do so,” said the report, titled “Licensing plates and animal cruelty: What you need to know.”
The FDA said it was reviewing the proposed rule to ensure it is in line with the agency’s goal of reducing the risk of animal cruelty and the public health threat posed by animal products.
The agency will take public comment on the rule through May 24.
The Food and Consumer Protection Bureau (FCCB) has also been working to improve the way consumers purchase plate plates.
FCPB Chairman Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) has proposed a bill that would expand the definition of a plate to include animal cruelty.
In response to the new rules, a number of states are moving to restrict how the plates can be used, or sold.
A number of state legislators have also introduced bills that would ban plates from being used as food or even as currency.
In an interview with Business Insider, Markey said the changes would help curb animal cruelty by making it harder for companies and consumers to buy plates that are likely to be used in cruelty.
“It’s the worst of all worlds.
It makes it so much harder for consumers to get plates,” Markey told Business Insider.
“The people who are buying these plates are really doing a lot of work.
These plates are a public safety threat.”
The rules also go after companies that have been selling plates to consumers without being licensed.
For example, an Alabama-based company called Vail-Lifesaver Inc. was found to be selling plates in Arizona without a license.
The company’s CEO pleaded guilty to animal cruelty charges in 2011 and was sentenced to 15 years in prison.
The FCPs rules would also affect businesses that have a franchise agreement with the FCP.
Currently, franchisees are required to be licensed to sell their plates.
The companies that are going to have to stop selling plates that do contain animal cruelty are also the companies that rely on consumers to make purchases.
The FCPBs proposed rules will help prevent these businesses from selling plate covers that contain animal abuse.
According to the report from the Institute For Justice, the proposed changes would have a devastating impact on the lives of animals and the communities that rely upon them.
“In a world where our food is so abundant, we are going back to the days when we could go into a store and buy whatever we wanted, and that’s what we did, right?
Now we’re going to be in a world that says, ‘No, you have to pay a certain amount of money for this.
If you do not pay that amount, we will not buy from you,'” said Markey.
“This is going back toward the days where you had to pay.
That’s the future we’re heading toward.
I think we have to protect animals and families that rely so heavily on them, and I think this is the right thing to do.”
Follow Michael on Facebook and Twitter.
Read more from Vice News:The Biggest Corporate Fraud in History: Big Banks, Big Corporations, and the Biggest Corruption in History.